Difference between revisions of "Talk:Personal Safe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
LightKnight (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
and it is a nice defense for nuclear reactor ... but it is more expenisve i think. [[User:LightKnight|LightKnight]] 00:35 , 28 December 2011 [GMT+2] | and it is a nice defense for nuclear reactor ... but it is more expenisve i think. [[User:LightKnight|LightKnight]] 00:35 , 28 December 2011 [GMT+2] | ||
block explosion raycasting and undestructable, only block that allow reactor shielding in single layer. |
Revision as of 11:34, 28 December 2011
Does it make sense that a nuke cant blow these boys up? Primis 23:36, 1 July 2011 (EST)
- well if you just could destroy it with nukes, griefers would like them much more as they already do ^^
by Feanturi(lol^^)
Still makes sense in single player since it's a double chest in 1 block. Daedroug 12:18, 19 September 2011
and it is a nice defense for nuclear reactor ... but it is more expenisve i think. LightKnight 00:35 , 28 December 2011 [GMT+2]
block explosion raycasting and undestructable, only block that allow reactor shielding in single layer.