Difference between revisions of "Talk:Personal Safe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Personal Chest to Talk:Personal Safe) |
|||
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Reply|user=Feanturi|space=:|agree=lol^^|reply=well if you just could destroy it with nukes, griefers would like them much more as they already do ^^}} | {{Reply|user=Feanturi|space=:|agree=lol^^|reply=well if you just could destroy it with nukes, griefers would like them much more as they already do ^^}} | ||
Still makes sense in single player since it's a double chest in 1 block. [[User:DaeDroug|Daedroug]] 12:18, 19 September 2011 | |||
and it is a nice defense for nuclear reactor ... but it is more expenisve i think. [[User:LightKnight|LightKnight]] 00:35 , 28 December 2011 [GMT+2] | |||
block explosion raycasting and undestructable, only block that allow reactor shielding in single layer. | |||
:But can they be magmified? --[[User:Draco18s|Draco18s]] 20:58, 18 May 2012 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 18:58, 18 May 2012
Does it make sense that a nuke cant blow these boys up? Primis 23:36, 1 July 2011 (EST)
- well if you just could destroy it with nukes, griefers would like them much more as they already do ^^
by Feanturi(lol^^)
Still makes sense in single player since it's a double chest in 1 block. Daedroug 12:18, 19 September 2011
and it is a nice defense for nuclear reactor ... but it is more expenisve i think. LightKnight 00:35 , 28 December 2011 [GMT+2]
block explosion raycasting and undestructable, only block that allow reactor shielding in single layer.
- But can they be magmified? --Draco18s 20:58, 18 May 2012 (CEST)