Difference between revisions of "Talk:LapPack"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:HellsJack|HellsJack]] 16 May 2012 (CEST) | --[[User:HellsJack|HellsJack]] 16 May 2012 (CEST) | ||
:Think thats wanted? In the same way you cannot recharge the lappack in a batbox --[[User:Pinkishu|Pinkishu]] | |||
:Think thats wanted? In the same way you cannot recharge the lappack in a batbox | |||
:--[[User:Pinkishu|Pinkishu]] | |||
I think that it is not logic to put the Lappack in the BatteryBox, because you'd have to do this 30 times to fill the LapPack. <br> | I think that it is not logic to put the Lappack in the BatteryBox, because you'd have to do this 30 times to fill the LapPack. <br> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 19: | ||
Pherhaps you could think about different currencies between BatPack and Lappack, but it is not written anywhere so <br> | Pherhaps you could think about different currencies between BatPack and Lappack, but it is not written anywhere so <br> | ||
you cann not say that it is because of this. | you cann not say that it is because of this. | ||
--[[User:HellsJack|HellsJack]] 18:12, 17 May 2012 (CEST) | --[[User:HellsJack|HellsJack]] 18:12, 17 May 2012 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 17 May 2012
Does this item work? The recipe does not seem to work and blocks of Lapis Lazuli seems kind of an odd recipe...
Malfunction[edit]
I have tried to recharge the Lappack in a Geothermal Generator.
Now i don't know why i can't put the Lappack in the upper rechargeslot but the same with a Batpack is working.
Is this forced by the programmers or is it a bug?
--HellsJack 16 May 2012 (CEST)
- Think thats wanted? In the same way you cannot recharge the lappack in a batbox
- --Pinkishu
I think that it is not logic to put the Lappack in the BatteryBox, because you'd have to do this 30 times to fill the LapPack.
And if you can put a BatPack in there, why not put a LapPack in the Geothermal Generator?
Pherhaps you could think about different currencies between BatPack and Lappack, but it is not written anywhere so
you cann not say that it is because of this.
--HellsJack 18:12, 17 May 2012 (CEST)