Difference between revisions of "Talk:Compressor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Subignition (talk | contribs) |
TakeruDavis (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::::I can't give an authoritative answer, but my guess is, as that's a mostly cosmetic recipe, it probably isn't intended to be secret. | :::::I can't give an authoritative answer, but my guess is, as that's a mostly cosmetic recipe, it probably isn't intended to be secret. | ||
:::::<b style="font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">[[User:Subignition|-- SubIgnition]] <i style="font-style: normal; font-size: 8pt">[[User_talk:Subignition|(talk)]]</i></b> 13:06, 21 October 2011 (CEST) | :::::<b style="font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">[[User:Subignition|-- SubIgnition]] <i style="font-style: normal; font-size: 8pt">[[User_talk:Subignition|(talk)]]</i></b> 13:06, 21 October 2011 (CEST) | ||
::::::Well, since it actually can have interesting effects.... in very warm enviroment, it is not just cosmetic --[[User:TakeruDavis|TakeruDavis]] 12:49, 22 October 2011 (CEST) |
Revision as of 10:49, 22 October 2011
Secret compression[edit]
Is there one thing kept in secret or was it just forgot to be mentioned? I dont want to post it, not even here, since it could be a secret... --TakeruDavis 19:55, 17 October 2011 (CEST)
- If you're referring to refining a certain Ore by compressing it, it's mentioned on the relevant pages so I don't see any reason to leave it out here.
—0x517A5D 06:56, 19 October 2011 (CEST)- Nope, I am refering to certain two vanilla items, spherical throwable as input and certain translucent, by normal means unobtainable block as output --TakeruDavis 03:15, 21 October 2011 (CEST)
- Oh yeah, that recipe. Mmm. Yeah, that might be seekrit. I suggest asking on the forums. Is it still 1:1 spherical to translucent cube? Around eight months ago I suggested 4:1 spherical to cube, then 1:1 cube to translucent cube. Alblaka said he thought that was reasonable, but I guess he never made the change.
—0x517A5D 04:05, 21 October 2011 (CEST)- Yes, its still one sphere to one cube and seeing how much secrets are around recipes here, I assumed it could be the case...--TakeruDavis 10:22, 21 October 2011 (CEST)
- I can't give an authoritative answer, but my guess is, as that's a mostly cosmetic recipe, it probably isn't intended to be secret.
- -- SubIgnition (talk) 13:06, 21 October 2011 (CEST)
- Well, since it actually can have interesting effects.... in very warm enviroment, it is not just cosmetic --TakeruDavis 12:49, 22 October 2011 (CEST)
- Yes, its still one sphere to one cube and seeing how much secrets are around recipes here, I assumed it could be the case...--TakeruDavis 10:22, 21 October 2011 (CEST)
- Oh yeah, that recipe. Mmm. Yeah, that might be seekrit. I suggest asking on the forums. Is it still 1:1 spherical to translucent cube? Around eight months ago I suggested 4:1 spherical to cube, then 1:1 cube to translucent cube. Alblaka said he thought that was reasonable, but I guess he never made the change.
- Nope, I am refering to certain two vanilla items, spherical throwable as input and certain translucent, by normal means unobtainable block as output --TakeruDavis 03:15, 21 October 2011 (CEST)