Difference between revisions of "Talk:Compressor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Should this be placed onto the page?: new section) |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Is there one thing kept in secret or was it just forgot to be mentioned? I dont want to post it, not even here, since it ''could'' be a secret... --[[User:TakeruDavis|TakeruDavis]] 19:55, 17 October 2011 (CEST) | Is there one thing kept in secret or was it just forgot to be mentioned? I dont want to post it, not even here, since it ''could'' be a secret... --[[User:TakeruDavis|TakeruDavis]] 19:55, 17 October 2011 (CEST) | ||
:If you're referring to refining a certain Ore by compressing it, it's mentioned on the [[Uranium|relevant]] [[Refined_Uranium|pages]] so I don't see any reason to leave it out here.<br/>—[[User:0x517A5D|0x517A5D]] 06:56, 19 October 2011 (CEST) | :If you're referring to refining a certain Ore by compressing it, it's mentioned on the [[Uranium|relevant]] [[Refined_Uranium|pages]] so I don't see any reason to leave it out here.<br/>—[[User:0x517A5D|0x517A5D]] 06:56, 19 October 2011 (CEST) | ||
::Nope, I am refering to certain two vanilla items, spherical throwable as input and certain translucent, by normal means unobtainable block as output --[[User:TakeruDavis|TakeruDavis]] 03:15, 21 October 2011 (CEST) | |||
:::Oh yeah, that recipe. Mmm. Yeah, that might be seekrit. I suggest asking on the forums. Is it still 1:1 spherical to translucent cube? Around eight months ago I suggested 4:1 spherical to cube, then 1:1 cube to translucent cube. Alblaka said he thought that was reasonable, but I guess he never made the change.<br/>—[[User:0x517A5D|0x517A5D]] 04:05, 21 October 2011 (CEST) | |||
::::Yes, its still one sphere to one cube and seeing how much secrets are around recipes here, I assumed it could be the case...--[[User:TakeruDavis|TakeruDavis]] 10:22, 21 October 2011 (CEST) | |||
:::::I can't give an authoritative answer, but my guess is, as that's a mostly cosmetic recipe, it probably isn't intended to be secret. | |||
:::::<b style="font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">[[User:Subignition|-- SubIgnition]] <i style="font-style: normal; font-size: 8pt">[[User_talk:Subignition|(talk)]]</i></b> 13:06, 21 October 2011 (CEST) | |||
::::::Well, since it actually can have interesting effects.... in very warm enviroment, it is not just cosmetic --[[User:TakeruDavis|TakeruDavis]] 12:49, 22 October 2011 (CEST) | |||
:::::::You make a good point, I had forgotten that temperature alone could cause those effects now. I do think that it should be the responsibility of server owners/administrators to police or disable grief-happy features of mods, rather than of the mod authors to hide/censor features people could abuse, but that's just my opinion. Sort of restricts the freedom of creativity authors would have otherwise. And I ''did'' say "mostly". :P | |||
:::::::<b style="font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">[[User:Subignition|-- SubIgnition]] <i style="font-style: normal; font-size: 8pt">[[User_talk:Subignition|(talk)]]</i></b> 15:54, 22 October 2011 (CEST) | |||
::::::::Well, I actually had in mind energy making machinery that has high temperature as its by-product. I mean The Big One.--[[User:TakeruDavis|TakeruDavis]] 00:33, 23 October 2011 (CEST) | |||
== Should this be placed onto the page? == | |||
I recently discovered that if you compress 3 netherack, you get a nether brick. Is this meant to be a secret? |
Latest revision as of 23:08, 11 May 2012
Secret compression[edit]
Is there one thing kept in secret or was it just forgot to be mentioned? I dont want to post it, not even here, since it could be a secret... --TakeruDavis 19:55, 17 October 2011 (CEST)
- If you're referring to refining a certain Ore by compressing it, it's mentioned on the relevant pages so I don't see any reason to leave it out here.
—0x517A5D 06:56, 19 October 2011 (CEST)- Nope, I am refering to certain two vanilla items, spherical throwable as input and certain translucent, by normal means unobtainable block as output --TakeruDavis 03:15, 21 October 2011 (CEST)
- Oh yeah, that recipe. Mmm. Yeah, that might be seekrit. I suggest asking on the forums. Is it still 1:1 spherical to translucent cube? Around eight months ago I suggested 4:1 spherical to cube, then 1:1 cube to translucent cube. Alblaka said he thought that was reasonable, but I guess he never made the change.
—0x517A5D 04:05, 21 October 2011 (CEST)- Yes, its still one sphere to one cube and seeing how much secrets are around recipes here, I assumed it could be the case...--TakeruDavis 10:22, 21 October 2011 (CEST)
- I can't give an authoritative answer, but my guess is, as that's a mostly cosmetic recipe, it probably isn't intended to be secret.
- -- SubIgnition (talk) 13:06, 21 October 2011 (CEST)
- Well, since it actually can have interesting effects.... in very warm enviroment, it is not just cosmetic --TakeruDavis 12:49, 22 October 2011 (CEST)
- You make a good point, I had forgotten that temperature alone could cause those effects now. I do think that it should be the responsibility of server owners/administrators to police or disable grief-happy features of mods, rather than of the mod authors to hide/censor features people could abuse, but that's just my opinion. Sort of restricts the freedom of creativity authors would have otherwise. And I did say "mostly". :P
- -- SubIgnition (talk) 15:54, 22 October 2011 (CEST)
- Well, I actually had in mind energy making machinery that has high temperature as its by-product. I mean The Big One.--TakeruDavis 00:33, 23 October 2011 (CEST)
- Well, since it actually can have interesting effects.... in very warm enviroment, it is not just cosmetic --TakeruDavis 12:49, 22 October 2011 (CEST)
- Yes, its still one sphere to one cube and seeing how much secrets are around recipes here, I assumed it could be the case...--TakeruDavis 10:22, 21 October 2011 (CEST)
- Oh yeah, that recipe. Mmm. Yeah, that might be seekrit. I suggest asking on the forums. Is it still 1:1 spherical to translucent cube? Around eight months ago I suggested 4:1 spherical to cube, then 1:1 cube to translucent cube. Alblaka said he thought that was reasonable, but I guess he never made the change.
- Nope, I am refering to certain two vanilla items, spherical throwable as input and certain translucent, by normal means unobtainable block as output --TakeruDavis 03:15, 21 October 2011 (CEST)
Should this be placed onto the page?[edit]
I recently discovered that if you compress 3 netherack, you get a nether brick. Is this meant to be a secret?